Rob W
Second Officer
Flight distance : 96152 ft
Sweden
Offline
|
If a person fly with a drone into restricted airspace, DJI can't be prosecuted, it is the person who flew the drone.
No, the reason DJI have done this is to enforce their solution onto the market, to win the hearts and minds of the authorities, civil air organisations, councils and legislators. If DJI are first with an acceptable solution that hinders drones to fly into restricted airspace, well, then they have won a huge share of the market, because sooner or later all drones on the market will need to have built-in restrictions.
Now DJI forces this upon us before any other competitions does it.
I don't mind security, but I am very much against having to "ask for permission" via a commercial drone makers software, a company that is here to earn money of their customers, if I can fly. DJI have nothing to do with it as it is now! It is between me, the laws in the country and the airspace where I want to fly in and if I have clearence from my closest airport to flywhere I want to fly!
If/when, the laws says that every drone needs software for hindering it to fly in restricted airspace, then so be it, I'll get a drone that has that restriction built-in so I can legally fly. |
|