Wolfiesden
lvl.3
United States
Offline
|
No. We don't.
Do you want Ford/Toyota/etc to do a firmware update behind your back automatically to your car that suddenly prevents it from driving any faster than the posted speed limit or maybe it would force you out of the fast lane if you have been in it too long? After all, auto accidents account for millions of deaths world wide every year.
In fact, I suspect the number of dead or injured in one hour due to speeding would amount to far greater than those killed or injured due to "drone" incursions since the first "drone" lifted off the ground. Yet somehow people seem hell bent to accept this "feature" as a needed precaution. Why?
Not one law suit has been filed, that I know of, alleging that Ford permitted their cars to knowingly violate the law (speeding) and it shouldn't be their fault for doing so. So why then does it seem logical for us to let DJI (any other company either) apply changes that effectively prevent us from flying the bird where and when we want to. If it flies into a NFZ, a warning SHOULD be noted on the app, thats simply good practice. But the USER should be allowed to control the aircraft. Its the PILOT who is responsible, not the PLANE (or drone) nor the MANUFACTURER of it just as its the DRIVER who is responsible for how the car is operated, not the MANUFACTURER.
I have no intention to violate any NFZ. But it, in the end, is MY responsibility, not DJI's. |
|