thehippoz
Second Officer
United States
Offline
|
Bill in Ohio Posted at 2017-5-25 11:20
Reedited this once I figured out you were referring to your edited file.
My editing computer doesn't have trouble editing files generated by Mavic in 4K, however using H265 to export the final product takes a lot longer, but a smaller file size. The finished 4K files play great on our UHD TV, but play erratically on my computer. (I7-5960 Octacore, 32GB RAM, GeForce GTX970 video card) in H265, but not H264 which plays well on both.
I think you need to look at your data rate, if it is to low then you will have blurring. What were your settings - Which program, Resolution, number of passes, and other settings etc. Since I like to shoot in 4K and edit on Premeire Pro, I usually use "settings that match input file" that usually produces really nice encoded video and have been experimenting with my settings. If you use 4K Hi datarate it is also good, but has trouble playing on the video apps, but clear and clean on UHD TV. If I use 4K medium datarate it produces splotchy video that is noticeable especially in areas with less contrast.
hmm Haswell-E has problems playing h.265? It's probably the software. I have a 6 core broadwell@4.2, plays 4k h.265 fine. The encoding times are a lot longer. I wish youtube supported h.265 uploads but it comes down to the encode times.
Found the best youtube settings for h.264 4k is 60-80, 2 pass vbr, main profile, max render and depth checked. Google keeps quality that way with a target of 56mbps, still get good rates on areas with a lot of motion. Noticed the older adobe media encoder doesn't do as good a job of compressing with the same settings as 2017. I got rid of the 2017 version, the files are smaller with the same project, but it's noticeable on youtube. |
|