droneflyers.com
Second Officer
Flight distance : 60709 ft
United States
Offline
|
I don't think you are correct on these matters!
Firstly, DJI already has a vast US Infrastructure - everything from lobbyists to lawyers to a new 75 person technical office in Palo Alto. They have 100's of US Employees and conform to all US codes and laws as far as all the FCC and UL (or equiv.) stuff.
If what you said was correct - heck, why should they be spending many millions conforming to US and Canadian law?
I'm no lawyer (but my daughter is), but am fairly certain you could "sue" DJI in the USA for warranty, consumer, liability and any other matters. This would apply to both state and federal situations.
Of course, lawsuits are expensive. Lawyers don't work for free.
The best course of action for those who dislike a product or maker is...don't buy it!
Knowing our society, there are probably lawsuits in progress against DJI as we speak. That is just the way things are in the USA.
Oh, it should also be mentioned that DJI is not fully Chinese. They have taken large investments from Silicon Valley. Those VC's aren't stupid. They are part owners...so if DJI hurts, they hurt.
When you really think hard about it DJI has the same goals as any real leader in the technology field. That is, to satisfy as many consumers as possible. There is no business case for screwing people...
DJI does come on strong. It is a very top-down company and when the word is given, everyone jumps to the tune. They make decisions like this and implement them.
Whether that is good or bad will be told in the years to come. I suspect, given my previous business experience, that being decisive is often more important than the exact subject of the decision(s). That is, the worse thing a company can often do is nothing... |
|