Super pilot
lvl.4
Flight distance : 174905 ft
Russia
Offline
|
djiuser_fwtdh0d947ZX Posted at 11-21 04:14
Super Pilot, we’re all passionate about drones but there is no need to attack me personally by making assumptions about what I do and don’t know. I have 20 years’ experience working for global brands in management, including 7 years in premium consumer tech, launching the most ubiquitous of tech devices with OTA for software updates and products with complex softwaremanipulation modes. I worked with product designers, software engineers, product teams and tested products long before they were sold globally to millions of customers.. Ow I always also fairly instrumental in launching a network of innovation centres. I think I have a fair amount of knowledge, so please do not attack forum participants like myself on your assumption that they have no knowledge.
DJI Dev and support teams have stated it’s a hardware issue. From a customer’s perspective the thing that is unclear at the moment about the MA2 is if the hardware components responsible for processing and writing image data and sensor data were downgraded in the MA2 or if the complexity of data increased between the MM1 and the MA2. It is common practice for manufacturers to improve their financial position by cutting costs by using less capable and cheaper components from one generation to the next. Perhaps this was the case here.
Can you give me an example of Apple's line of computers where the next generation used the worst processors or RAM? The Mavic Air 2's APAS system performs much better than the Mavic Air V1. ALL smart features work much better. MA2 has an H6 processor, MA1 has an H3 processor. 4K / 60 fps vs 4K / 30 fps. All of these data indicate that the processor does its job well and is very energy efficient. Knowing this information, how can we even make hypothetical assumptions that DJI used outdated sensors and equipment in the new drone and consider this the reason for the rejection of the Waypoints function? Do you like science fiction?
When planning a new product, managers are in charge. They predict and endow the developed product with the necessary technical and software solutions in their opinion and set tasks for the developers of components and software. In this case, developers are only pawns who carry out orders from their superiors. They cannot add any intelligent function they want to the product; everything needs permission from their superiors. Managers initially decided to replace Waypoints with Hyperlapse. This miscalculation or a cunning move is unknown to me. But the fact that the Mavic 2 has Hyperlapse and Waypoints at the same time speaks for the latter. The Mavic 2 has both a worse processor and more obstacle sensors, and it all works together. The 2016 Phantom 4 Pro works great and still captures great footage! I don't believe there is any hardware problem with the Mavic Air 2 that supposedly prevents the addition of Waypoints. As a last resort, a chunk of 8GB of internal storage can be used to add this feature. Much more realistic is the desire of DJI managers to divide their line of drones not only in price, but also in features.
MINI 2 - QuickShots.
Mavic Air 2 - QuickShots, ActiveTrack, Hyperlapse.
Mavic 2 - QuickShots, ActiveTrack, Hyperlapse, Point of Interest, Waypoints, TapFly.
All this DJI logic can be traced in an elementary way. |
|