DroneX4
lvl.3
Flight distance : 180584 ft
Canada
Offline
|
Griffith Posted at 2017-7-3 18:13
Nobody's trying to defend DJI, Hallmark007 and others are trying to explain why the 100 meter limit makes design sense, given the Spark architecture. Go have a couple of cold ones and think about it for a couple of days.
If you want a drone to follow you around like a puppy, get a Lilly.
'Get another / different drone' is not really an acceptable answer here. It is actually quite a defeatist attitude to have. I would imagine DJI is looking to improve the products it puts out. I am simply pointing out a feature I would like to see improved. I would like the option to bypass that distance limit (not the home point itself). No one has addressed this issue yet and all assumed that I wanted to remove the home point or dynamically set a new home point (this would work as well but is not required).
This is how I imagine it would work:
1. Take off, home point is set
2. Active track subject
3. If wifi signal is lost... prompt and hover or RTH (set in DJI GO 4)
4. If subject is lost... prompt and hover or RTH (set in DJI GO 4)
5. If battery is low, prompt and select RTH, Hover, or Land
6. If almost past point of no return - prompt and RTH, Hover, Land, or Continue Tracking
These could all be set in DJI GO 4 but give you the option to bypass as it encounters the issue.
There does not need to be a 100m distance limit to RTH, this depends on the battery remaining on the spark. It can return to home at a much greater distance than that.
Again, please explain how this 100m home point distance limit makes sense in active track? Note: I AM NOT ASKING ABOUT REMOVING THE HOME POINT ITSELF. Because contrary to what you have said, no one has given a satisfactory explanation for this distance limit. I am not asking for much here, really. The push back from certain individuals is quite alarming, not even taking the time to understand the issue, just saying 'buy / use another drone', or 'quit whining' is not going to help improve anything. The question is 'WHY is this distance limitation is in place?'. No one knows obviously, and that is fine. But the speculation from some that it is to make me 'pay' for my choice to buy the flyless.. is well.. frankly.. absurd. The remote is not required to do what is being asked about.
If enough people wanted this ability, then it may just happen. But with the likes of some users around here, progress is going to be slow because the 'help' they offer is 'accept it, or buy something else. no room for improvement here'. |
|