ErichG
lvl.2
Flight distance : 74180 ft
United States
Offline
|
So far, using iPad Air 2, I haven't had this issue with I2. Went through two sets of batteries last evening hovering at 400' for sunset without any video drops, processing errors, etc. Temps here in Indiana were about 85F. Not trying to rub salt in wounds, just observing the bug seems to be somewhat case/model specific and wanted to contribute my experience. (I'd been reading this thread with dread yesterday, and wanted to stress test with Air2).
Flew alongside a friend using old Phantom3 with old iPad mini, and he didn't have issues either.
Am I right there are two issues being reported here? The tertiary issue is that some people's apps are not "registering" properly and ending up range-limited. With latest firmware, I'm not seeing any range restrictions other than the ones I have set in software; at least I'm flying all the way to 400 feet without issue and can amble out pretty far. I have no idea if this might be related to folks' apps not being updated, or getting fubared and needing to be reinstalled, or who knows what. But if people are experiencing chronic ceiling and range limiting, that sounds like some kind of edge case bug biting DJI and their customers' in the buttocks.
Meanwhile, what ronin, Roger, and others are experiencing is much more frustrating and potentially dangerous broken behavior, likely due to some other unanticipated bug in the birds. Crossing my fingers for everyone that they identify and correct as soon as possible, and encourage everyone here to be as constructive as they can be, under the circumstances, to reach that outcome.
With respect to skyeyeguy's comments about no fly zones - as someone who's taking the Part107 process seriously, I personally don't have a problem with collecting telemetry and restricting airspace. The goal is to make hobbiest class flying as well integrated with the airspace as possible, so that everyone can operate freely and safely. If we ever hope to fly beyond line of sight, in any context, or have altitude restrictions relaxed in any way, my view is that DJI is behaving responsibly, and smartly, by getting ahead of the curve and demonstrating how these systems can be implemented. As someone operating a fairly expensive and potentially very dangerous flying object, I expect my fellow hobbyists to understand and respect airspace restrictions, and if they can't or won't then I certainly support the manufacturer enforcing reasonable restraints. Anticipating some response here - I share people's privacy and security concerns, but in this instance, find the safety trade off worth it.
As it stands, the DJI application allows operation within the perimeter of Class D airspace with just a warning, and a process to unlock restricted airspace beyond that. What more should we want? Should we just trust that everyone understands the pattern and will demonstrate good airmanship around their local Class B airports? No thanks. Meanwhile, if recording flight telemetry makes it possible to differentiate between pilot and equipment failures so that DJI can offer replacement warranty service and cheaper insurance products, I'm all for that as well. Or should we just restrict flying drones to people who have passed a Part107 exam? That would be lame.
For those hobbyists who object to these restraints, then by all means go out and build a bird with a Pixhawk - it's a lot of fun, and totally open source. |
|