Nemroig
lvl.2
Flight distance : 192930 ft
Spain
Offline
|
Regarding to range and image transmission issues, and referring to many threads with the same issues:
I can not understand why you DJI does not do a massive and definitive action to solve this problem, perhaps accepting that some units are defective, if it is evident that a very large part of those who have bought a Spark we have the same image transmission issues, image freezing and loss connection with the RC at infinitely lower distances than those advertised by the company for this AC, and for a common use.
In your commercials we can see how the happy owners of the brand new Spark fly them in their graduation party, in basketball games, in their children car races...
...and seeing that I wonder: Do you want us to believe that in all these places, crowded with people, there is not a single interference caused by devices and that hese places are located in the middle of nowhere away from buildings, electric towers and other possible sources of intereferences? Come on !!
As I have said here on other occasions, I do not find it acceptable that "we have to go to the moon" to be free of all interference. At least, we have not been told before buying the product, nor warned in your ads.
Last week I was flying again in my neighborhood, in a park of about 300 x 300 meters; mainly trees, few people around. I sent the spark to 60 or 70 meters height to be able to direct the antennas directly and perfectly to him (as indicated in the tutorials). No buildings, no trees or other objects between us. Once again, it was disappointing that the image sometimes froze just over 50 meters far away, so I'm not sending it any further, of course.
But it can be worst. Here a good testing I did last weekend:
I was in a really lonely area, practically nothing around, excellent for testing. The results have not been satisfactory:
As you can see in the videos, I tested at 5.8 Ghz and then at 2.4 Ghz, sending the spark straight ahead, absolutely nothing between us.
Image and connection to the RC was lost much sooner than it should according to advertising:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2g0k5b4vd7osxp0/Image_transmission_issue1-5%2C8Ghz.mp4?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xkzldhqdsj34ndj/Image_transmission_issue2-2%2C4Ghz.mp4?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2oswc38bnub9wt8/Image_transmission_issue3.mp4?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/16z4f8d53nll4di/Image_transmission_issue4.mp4?dl=0
Also, look for these errors or malfunctions:
1. Command timeout.
2. Battery level increases and decreases, even up to almost 18 minutes remaining !!!
-----
Obviously, it is impossible to fly the Spark in areas with some trees or in highlands. The only safe thing is to fly in totally clear places such as the middle of the ocean or cliffs, but then, why do you want a drone if you can not "inspect" highlands, forests an similar areas?
I have not bought a Drone for this, and I think it's DJI's fault because Spark's capabilities and possibilities advertisings are misleading, or my drone is defective.
Whatever it is, what is totally unacceptable is that we have to be worried to whether the connection or image will be lost, instead of enjoying.
------
DJI: I'm not satisfied with this purchase. I think that your products are fantastic (at least as shown in advertising), but it seems that Spark has not worked well in its first version.
As I see it, either my drone is defective or not suitable for the intended use as advertised, so I see 2 options:
1. I send the drone back to you for disagreement with the product, and I am refunded.
2. I give confidence to DJI and I try with a Mavic Pro (I return the spark and pay for the difference).
What can we do, DJI?
* Note: All FW and app are up-to-date, the phone is in airplane mode (wifi on) and no bluetooth sources nearby.
|
|