Dobmatt
First Officer
Flight distance : 1831050 ft
Canada
Offline
|
fansa84fe8a4 Posted at 2017-10-24 17:22
And you'd be proven wrong by a couple of mine.
They haven't gotten the mold right for the ill-fitting and loose props for almost a year now so what makes you think they are properly balanced? This isn't military spec'd gear, nor given quality time to balance and assure proper fitting for each prop they make.
All I'm saying is that DJI prop balancing is extremely difficult to perform properly. It requires a lot of knowledge and experience. It's a rocket science, really. I quit worrying about it after several unsuccessful attempts.
Sanding off a few particles too much or in wrong spot will make a difference on Du-Bro stand. Now, take into account unreliability of balancing shafts. With many poorly designed incarnations available on eBay, the shaft end will attempt to sit tight and solid in prop mount cavity. This cavity is manufactured with loosely specified tolerances, which - in some causes - results with props rattle. You may be able to eliminate this rattle by home-cooked shimming of some sort, but only vertically. Off center mounting variables are impossible to manage, therefore rendering the balancing process unreliable. Another words, what may seem to be right on Du-Bro stand, may be just wrong on Inspire prop mount.
I haven't seen any properly design shaft end (by far) to sit properly in rectangular opening of Inspire quick mount props. I've heard about handmade adapters, carved off wood block ... Please correct me if I'm wrong.
These issues are irrelevant in case of conventional props balancing, which are made with a single center hole to fit tightly on motor shaft and secured by single nut. Since DJI introduced "quick" mount concept, the entire idea of prop balancing went down the drain. Too many variables, impossible to manage. The props itself are just fine and must be consistent. Quick mount design or manufacturing faults, however, is another story.
Good luck with your balancing, anyway ... |
|