Negens
 lvl.1
Colombia
Offline
|
sya Posted at 2017-12-6 12:51
Where did you find the information about CineCore processor model? Did you tear the Inspire 2 down?
If it is true then It is interesting why DJI has refused to use Ambarella SoC as on the previous cameras.
I found the information in a Chinese website from a guy who disassembled the Inspire 2.
This Xilinx fpga can handle 4K@60fps, and we can push it more by losing fps, it means, 6k@30fps and 8K@15fps.
It's the same for the newest Xilinx ultrascale+.
I have few information about the Ambarella H2 and H3 but I don't know it it's as programmable as the Xilinx solutions. I mean, I'm not sure we can bypass the h.264/h.265 encoders/decoders and implement Prores and CinemaDNG in it.
Unfortunately, Ambarella doesn't sell products for personal developments, so it's quite impossible to have any reliable information if we're not a big company.
The Xilinx solutions are more open to public and so easier to develop. And I think they often embed some great available image processing algorithms.
I was thinking about developing a camera body using the Zenmuse X7 and a Xilinx Ultrascale+ but my image processing skills are too low, and it needs to have a really good knowledge of complex convolution methods.
Only the hardware (includeing the X7) would cost around 5000 to 6000 usd.
Building a developers and designers team around such a project would cost a lot.
If I was developing it all by myself, it would cost me a loooooot of time.
At this price, I think, for me, it's better buying directly a Kinemax 6K camera. And to be honest, I think we should wait a little because the 6K is just an intermediate resolution and they are many research and developing around the 8K hardware and consumer products.
But it would cost so much in memory and computing for post-processing that for the moment, I will stay in the 4K domain. It's largely enough for my needs. |
|