Elektrica Atellani
Captain
Flight distance : 9674836 ft
Italy
Offline
|
Huebi Posted at 2018-3-3 04:15
It's sad that you're trying to talk another product down. Do you need it? Just because it's expensive doesn't always have to be good. It can always solve everything, even your system is not the perfect solution, but very expensive. I also don't see that a CFK tube protects the motors from twisting. It does not have to be beautiful, but light and practical. With the bracket of Pimp-your-Kopter. de nothing is changed at the I2 itself. So no guarantee loss. You also have to fix your system to the I2, which is a change to the I2. www.Pimp-your-Kopter.de's solution therefore makes more sense than a CFK Tube. https://www.pimp-your-kopter.de/dji-multikopter/dji-inspire-2/zubehoer-dji-inspire-2/i2-sicherungsklammer.php
I've been discussing the same 'comparison' before, some people even compared this solution to folding propellers (???).
If you compare this to a clamp, I am entitled to express my opinion and point out the number of differences, which are, forgive me, quite a bit.
If you compare a bicycle to a a motorcycle and assume they are similar and achieve the same purpose, I am entitled to let you know that one has an engine, probably better brakes, can go faster, can go uphill easier, etc. Sure, you can tell me the bicycle does not use gas and it's generally cheaper, but beside having two wheels they are just not the same thing and (Generally) speaking one is quite a bit more complex than the other.
Simple is not always better, in some cases simple is just obvious.
Clamps are the most obvious partial fix, but they carry a series of drawbacks with it.
Maybe I am not good enough at explaining these stark differences in practicality and performance, but ,for example, by not using external screws that bolt into the motor cover, as trivial of a difference this might seem to you, it does make a difference to us, as it was a very precise and thoughtful decision (Not wanting to alter the original parts of the Inspire 2) VS the obvious.
The differences are simply too many to compare them IMHO, but again, it's just an opinion. Your solution is good if you accept the number of drawbacks that come with it VS the fact that is cheaper, which is the only advantage minus the missing functionality., etc. etc. etc
This is not a battle of the cheapest accessory, it should be about what is making the I2 the safest with available solutions. There's plenty clamps, the one you mention and others, but nothing more than that, unless you consider our solution, which is obviously very different and with different, higher performance (and cost if you will).
I will be just happy to make my I2 as safe as possible in the smartest way that I know of, even if it's costing me time and money to create it. I could have made clamps in house in hours, but chose to work on a sophisticated solution... Rest assured, I am happy that you are happy with your solution. We can agree to disagree. Peace and have a nice weekend. |
|