djiuser_KFAyx3sFSGsl
lvl.2
United States
Offline
|
DJI Elektra Posted at 2018-3-9 03:23
Rob, If you use the third party app, we can not make sure it function well in CS. We do not recommend you users use other apps on CS. Thanks for your attention.
@ DJI Electra,
Thank for the reply but this is disingenuous at the least and this is simply towing the DJI CrystalSky party line of "we can not make sure it function well".
Everyone KNOWS this is complete rubbish - or at least those with a solid background in Android programming, hardware development and cybersecurity.
Not rubbish because it is or it is not true, but that it is being used across the board as an excuse for DJI to lock down the functionality of the CrystalSky so that it may not be use with other apps - the opposite of how these devices should have been intended to be used.
DJI does not make ANY mobile devices, nor does DJI make any tablets that I am aware of and therefore they cannot "control" those devices and the compatibility therein. This does not seem to bother, nor slow down DJI from creating the apps for use on a wide variety of devices. Though there are occasional glitches, DJI has no problem there - so what is the long game here with DJI?
The 800lb gorilla in the room is that DJI is locking down a great device for whatever reason - none of which make any sense from an end user's case, nor from an "open" business use case.
The only reasons would be (just a few), poor hardware, a lack of paying or cooperation with Google to use the PlayStore or that DJI does not want operators to use the CrystalSky with thier 3rd party and free apps and therefore force those users to use ONLY DJI apps - at least without "hacking" or implicit trust.
If there is a legitimate case, please let it be know here, please to not infer or assume but inform those that have spent tens of thousands of dollars in DJI equipment as to why not.
It cannot be due to security so that is a moot point. If I can plug a USB or other external media device into the CrystalSky, it can be pwned (infected or controlled in some way). So we are required to install standalone or DJI only applications that we cannot properly verify via vendor or Google Play Store - we have to implicitly trust the download - that makes ZERO sense!?
The owners of these devices are usually licensed and insured pilots that "trust" the equipment being provided to them under some type of guarantee, not blind faith, Many of these professionals have a career or business riding on this.
Additionally, does DJI really care to go down the path that Apple has?
To the point where the device has become so locked down that they own the device and the user simply leases the device? If I am paying 500+ USD for a device, I want to load the applications I deem necessary to run my business, I want to "control" the device within norms - not the manufacturer - safety aside.
Apple fanboys need not reply... I own and hack them all - no loyalty here...
What this causes is an environment where users begin to reach out to forums such as XDA Developers (great site) for a method to root the device and employ mechanisms THEY deem necessary to facilitate their business needs.
This may be okay when the user completely understands the risks but it is another thing entirely when the user deploys a method such as rooting and it causes unintentional consequences. The user really has no way to verify (completely) that rooting, or arguably side loading could cause an issue with the DJI controller engine.
So is this where a DJI attorney steps in and makes a legal statement such as "we do not support, or condone that behavior". Great, every EULA makes that same statement... but what is the inherent risk to the company when it does take place - lawsuit regardless.
The bottom line is simply this... why? Why has DJI decided to go down this path, nothing being stated makes any sense. These monitors and those like them are very capable of rather robust input/output - if a SnapDragon processor smartphone and tablet can, so can they but they do not - so why? |
|