HedgeTrimmer
First Officer
United States
Offline
|
Bulldog Posted at 2018-5-14 04:49
You guys are funny, and are missing the point IMO.
Of course metal interference could be a problem for your drone, but the fact is, it takes a ton of metal to interfere with your drone. Let me just ask a question........ How many drone crashes would instantly be DJI's fault if there was a way to check if metal interference was or was not the actual problem? There is your answer folks.
and are missing the point IMO.
Of course metal interference could be a problem for your drone, but the fact is, it takes a ton of metal to interfere with your drone.
From my opening post:
Test source of steel
The vehicle used for Magnetic Interefernce is primarily made of steel, with a weight of 6.3 tons.
Handheld GPS with digital compass:
15 degrees deviation starting at 20" from starboard side of vehicle
05?* degrees deviation starting at 48" from starboard side of vehicle.
Don't believe it's me who is missing the point on Magnetic Interference and distances. It is someone else who can't bring himself to acknowledge realities of Magnetic Intereference. Magenetic Interference is to often blamed for other problems, becoming a scapegoat.
From researching issue of magantism and compasses, and known laws of physics involving magnatism - magnetic interference to compasses caused by ferous metals rapidly decreases as distance from source to compass is increased. Which my previous field testing results with compasses and MPP/CS-Ub/GO-4 demonstrated.
Common sense bares same fruit. Massive steel hauled ships have compasses, and those compasses work. For decades cars have had compasses inside, and those compasses work.
We have seen videos of drones being flown by and under metal bridges made of tons of steel. We have seen videos of drones flying near trains, tons of steel.
Point of this thread was to bring some reality to drones and Magnetic Interefernce. There has been to many claims and to much good meaning advice, clouding up realty.
|
|