Mark Weiss
Second Officer
United States
Offline
|
Inspired Inspire Posted at 2-12 06:59
This has nothing to do with consumer protection laws. Blanketly allowing motor start should be a crime, not simply hindering it in certain areas. Nobody has to "beg for permission". In certain flight zones, us Remote Pilots are merely required to document our identity, our crafts validity and formally request flight authorization. Remember, a "toy model aircraft" can hurt, even kill someone if not operated in a safe and professional manner or even collide with a passenger aircraft. Yes, it's a pain to have to go through all the steps in order to fly in certain areas but the industry is evolving at an alarming rate and the checks and balances are a valid necessity. Granted, the FAA should have spent the money to have the UNLOCK interface be a simple procedure, but no, they are WAY behind on that. The approval process will become more fluid as time passes. Overall, I'm glad the restrictions are in place or else every Tom, Dick and Mary could just buy a quad and fly wherever, wherever and as high as they wanted to and you know darn well that would be happening everywhere, without restrictions in place. Please stay calm, stay safe and keep flying responsibly.
It's going too far when you can't fly in your own back yard, or even indoors, because you are within 5 miles of a heliport or a hospital.
Face the fact that if a passenger plane is flying below treetop level over your back yard, it's going to crash. No commercial aircraft should be flying that low unless it's lost power and is in the process of augering in.
What I can get behind is an altitude restriction as you get closer to an air field perimeter. A blanket ban on motor start is just wrong. There's just no way to collide with commercial a/c at below 100', unless you are flying ON the airport runway.
|
|