Aardvark
 Captain
Flight distance : 384432 ft
Offline
|
El Diablo Posted at 2018-9-10 23:31
You are more than welcome. I would like to add a small remark to the quality of the image. Many folks buy an expensive drone or camera lens and then put a cheap piece of glass in front of it (filter). It is a shame to spend 1.500$ to shoot in the best 4K quality and then ruin the result to save 30$... just my 2 cents.
Filters get more expensive accordingly to their diameter (I have a 105mm Singh-Ray, 500$ Gold-N-Blue Polarizer) so the filters for drones should be relatively cheaper. I would like to suggest that you go for the mid-upper tier in the price range, cheaper glass will have worse light transmission properties, they will introduce color cast, more ghosting and flaring and probably will affect the image's contrast reducing the overall sharpness.
"Many folks buy an expensive drone or camera lens and then put a cheap piece of glass in front of it (filter)."
And that is quite probably the most common mistake made, that whatever is placed in front of the lens affects the image. And all are far from equal.
I've photographed as a hobbyist for many years now and am at the comfortable stage regarding most of the technicalities involved in photography, and dabbled a bit in Astro' imaging (a good learning curve). As such there are sometimes bits that are forgotten that are second nature to the keen amateur or professional. I will be adding good ND filters to my wish list for the Mavic 2 Pro :-) (top of list is M2P).
I use the DJI filters on both my P4 (screw on) & Mavic Pro (clips are a bit cheap & nasty though), using ND 4, 8 & 16. My logic being that they would be 'matched' to the DJI optics in the lenses. This of course is probably wishful thinking, but they seem to give good results.
|
|