mareklew
lvl.2
Flight distance : 4026 ft
United States
Offline
|
They are quite different animals. Right now I must say I like the Sony more, it's just so much more mature product made by a company who understands how video business is run - THEY pretty much run it anyway.
The Sony has proper frame rates and up to 100fps the picture quality stays OK, you can do 200fps but the quality suffers. The camera is splash-proof (rain proof) even without additional housing, has a built-in WiFi&Bluetooth based remote connection capability and comes with an optional standalone remote that has own screen. Remote control app does not phone home, does not play videos on its own, it does what it should and the camera remembers all the settings afterwards (no funny phone-only mode that you lose once you operate the camera). Sony has no external moving parts, yet the camera module within is mounted on a 2.5D gimbal-like stabilizer. Sony has front-facing stereo microphones and the sound quality out-of-camera is pretty good, if you consider it's an action cam it's downright awesome.
Sony can't do 4k at more than 25/30fps. Sony stabilization on pitch and yaw is super, but roll has sharp limits, so you really have to hold the cam stable upright when walking, or the picture will rotate and bounce sharply on the roll axis, which is why I considered Osmo.
The sound pickup from behind is bad on the Sony (which is really a good thing when using it as what it was designed for, i.e. being a camera), so filming and running a commentary at the same time doesn't work very well without another mike.
You can't get videos off the Sony without connecting it in mass storage mode (i.e. it's a bit difficult to backup a video online using only your phone, because you don't have a video preview and easy way to select videos to download like in the Mimo App).
If you need the screen, Sony takes longer to boot and connect with the remote than Osmo needs to start (sure thing, Osmo has its screen built in). On the other hand, Sony has a B/W LCD status display that you can see in full sun and it doesn't need almost any power, so you can kind of point the camera the right way and press record without even so much as taking the remote out - in this mode Sony starts recording within 3..4 seconds after first button is pressed.
Difference, not really better/worse: Sony is ultra wide angle, Osmo is just wide angle. Some shots need one, some are better with the other.
Both cameras will flare when pointed towards sun, but Sony will do less so and fail more gracefully (the image is less washed out when overexposed).
Suspected, not proven: Osmo has worse audio-video sync and holds framerate less stably than the Sony. I can't put my finger on it just yet, so I file it under "suspected".
For me, Osmo was to fill in as a pocket camera to shoot some commentary to send home from when I travel. Sony is more of "gather material and cut it later" thing to me, as it encourages you to just let it roll along when something interesting happens, kind of fire and forget. |
|