Sparkz71
lvl.4
Flight distance : 24259 ft
Australia
Offline
|
Warriewoodlad Posted at 2-6 23:42
Hello Sparkz71.
I'm not sure why the error you describe is a problem. However, the distance travelled seems to be measured on a 2D map. This means that if you fly 100m away and 100m up the 141m travelled is only recorded as 100m, a 41% error. However, assuming your ceiling is 100m the error reduces to 5% at 300m out and 2% at 500m. So for most flight patterns, limited to the required 120m altitude, the error would be quite small. Depending on the requirements of the pilot, this small error could be overtaken by other factors such as wind drift, battery life, etc.
Certainly, if you fly high over short distances and total distance travelled is important, you are being short changed.
It's not a problem to me. I understand now that you referred to 2D. In reality, unlike a motor vehicle travelling on the ground building up distance, Spark can travel in 3D. So the distance 'should' be based on the physical movement from point A to B, regardless of 'ground' distance. If I have a ride-on lawn mower, tractor, speed boat etc the active time is calculated in hours the engine is running & distance is not relevant. I'm just asking what is fair to evaluate distance considering a plane/'chopper/drone may fuel up to travel 200 miles, yet it may also travel 30000 ft up & down. So there is 60000 ft not counted? Movement is distance, regardless of direction. I'm sorry to be a pain, but it seems logical. If I fly to the moon directly above my head, how much distance have I covered. If nothing, I am still on the ground - or did I fly to the moon without anybody knowing? Does that make sense?
|
|