Ray-CubeAce
Second Officer
United Kingdom
Offline
|
David_Harry Posted at 3-16 07:57
Hi Ray.
Thanks for the very detailed response, I'm sure this will be invaluable information for other Pocket users thinking about getting the mic adaptor or users who already have one and need some tips for best usage. I'm really looking forward to your final video example.
Hi Ray.
Thanks for the very detailed response, I'm sure this will be invaluable information for other Pocket users thinking about getting the mic adaptor or users who already have one and need some tips for best usage. I'm really looking forward to your final video example.
I should have it ready soon. Rendering it now.
So far from what I've seen around the forum and the web, there seem to be many issues with this interface. By the looks of how bulky the interface is, it does look like it's got some active circuitry in it, possibly an IC that's doing the A to D. In any event, I've heard some pretty bad audio examples with good mics, which does suggest that the DJI audio sub-system isn't very good.
If I had to guess I'd say the first issue with the interface is one of impedance, which could also explain why an otherwise good microphone doesn't sound so good and low on the adaptor.
My test mic is low impedance.
That anomaly you describe between the two channels, one may be slightly inverted and possibly a time difference, sounds like what I'd described with the internal mics where you almost get a sense of width with noise but the dialogue is centered. Again, as I'd suggested in that initial appraisal, there could be time/phase issues introduced at the encoding stage as it's encoded to two channels. If this is the case, it would affect both a mono and stereo source as both are being encoded to two channels. In any event, you are describing something very similar, if not the same, as I'd noticed.
I thought the same. I first noticed with the internal mics when passing a stream. The water flow sounded really off.
It may even be the case that an external source is being unnecessarily treated the same way that the internal mics are, with the same cancellation and dynamics processing.
Didn't the original testers complain about handling noise and wasn't there a software update before the public versions were shipped to 'improve the signal quality'? Could that now be reversed?
I'm still not sure that it is recording stereo properly, I've got a feeling that it's some kind of a difference encoding, or it's simply not stereo and recording strange anomalies.
Wait till my video comes out. Maybe more questions than answers.
If you get time maybe try recording a stereo source, say a CD player or stereo music source like a phone's headphone output and just plug them straight into the interface. This will be the only definitive way of knowing for sure if it's recording true stereo. Centering both channels and reversing the phase of one will also give you some straight answers.
I personally daren't. My smartphone is not a tested one and although I can get it to work with my phone, only reliably with the base connector. So I can't monitor sound levels and have the mic adaptor in use at the same time. Sorry.
Even before the jury's out on this one, I think it's safe to say that at the very least this interface is problematic and at worse is going to be unusable for many people wanting professional audio/dialogue/microphone results.
Yes and No.
I wonder if those people who were using the GoPro interface to justify the price of the DJI interface would still say the same thing now. I've not heard one example yet of the DJI interface that comes close to the quality of the GoPro one and we also now know that the DJI interface has nowhere near the audio or technical abilities of the GoPro interface.
Haven't had the experience with a GoPro although my son stopped using his in favour of the Osmo Pocket. He actually likes the inboard mics for what he does.
Anyway. Thanks again Ray for your efforts, they're greatly appreciated and will help others.
I had hoped that as well, will wait and see what the response is like later.
Cheers,
Dave.
|
|