patiam
Second Officer
Flight distance : 1118740 ft
United States
Online
|
Geebax Posted at 5-11 02:35
'It would be good if it didn't do that'. Yeah well the long history of this forum and DJI has demonstrated that DJI do not listen to what people on here ask for. The P4PRTK is still basically a P4 and operates in almost exactly the same way, and it appears that once DJI decide that a particular feature is, in their eyes, a good idea, they do not change. And that is largely true of the Chinese in many business practices. You simply have yet to come to terms with that. Ask the members here how DJI has responded to constant criticism of their NFZ policy.
"You simply have yet to come to terms with that. Ask the members here how DJI has responded to constant criticism of their NFZ policy"
Yeah, kinda like that terrain awareness thing you were so sure was impossible, eh?
But seriously, I'm not making the claim that folks calling for a software enhancement here actually resulted in it happening (and also not ruling it out). But to think that that expectation is the only reason for voicing issues with the hardware and software we've been given is shortsighted.
True, our complaints on this forum may never actually drive improvements in the systems we all use. But raising the issues serves another purpose- sharing experience and educating fellow users about the pitfalls and shortcomings of the platform. We do this not only to vent, but to develop and share workarounds, and even if it has a low chance of success, to voice our wishes to DJI for bug fixes and enhancements.
You can save your admonishments about the likelihood of DJI acting on issues raised in this forum for noobs that bother to engage with the DJI rep/mod/bots here. Since we're all aware of that, maybe we can contribute constructively to discussions of system issues in a way that benefits each other, or if not, just abstain?
I'll not respond to your statement about "the Chinese" beyond saying that I won't respond to it.
|
|