Innocence
 lvl.3
Flight distance : 55420 ft
United Kingdom
Offline
|
DO NOT MERGE. Mods are merging this post to hide it.
Full story: www.dontbuydji.com
https://forum.dji.com/thread-194345-1-1.html
For any of you guys who read my previous post and horrendous journey with my Mavic Air, this is the next part.
I received an email from DJI on Friday, telling me that they had come to the conclusion that I had self serviced my drone (Not sure how they managed that when I didn't).
I did not self service this drone. It was flown once and did not crash and had no reason to be self serviced, check my flight log. I had it for 2 weeks before sending back.
I sent two drones back to DJI previously, why were they not self serviced as well?
I had warranty and DJI Refresh, why would I not send it back just like the other two, especially in the middle of a case where I was asked to test it by DJI and send it back if there was issues?
DJI admitted to me that this was a refurbished drone and 'technically not brand new'.
My questions to DJI.
Please tell me the reason this drone was sent back to you originally and the repair that was carried out when it was refurbished to prove it wasn’t self serviced by the previous owner or not done properly through your engineer. The previous owner probably self serviced it and it wasn’t checked properly before being sent to me.
Can you show me pictures of the internals of the drone before it was sent to me to prove it wasn’t previously self serviced and prove it wasn’t in that condition when it was sent to me.
Can you show me the serial number of the drone with the damage in images to prove that was my drone you were sending in the photos.
If you can’t prove all of this, you cannot claim that I self serviced it as you do not have the history of this drone and cannot be 100% sure that this wasn’t self serviced previously and sent to me in this condition.
This was the email I received:
'We have consulted our upper departments in Production department, Quality control department, and FAE department.
We will write you our investigation result and a conclusion for you in this case:
Investigation:
- The anti-tampering sticker
1. The anti-tampering sticker is damaged. Our company policy, as it is stated and printed on the sticker: damage on sticker thus will void your warranty. The damaged sticker is an irrefutable physical evidence that your aircraft was opened by someone other than certified DJI personnel.

- Glue

2. The removed glue is still in the aircraft and it is most unlikely that our Engineer has left the removed glue in the craft, against our explicit repair procedure.
3. If your current product was forgotten to be glued on this specific soldering part during manufacturing process, it is most unlikely that the other soldering parts were glued perfectly.
4.The color of the removed glue and the applied glue are the same. This means that the glues were applied in the same time. This means that the removed glue belongs to this craft, and someone forgot to throw it away after removing.
As result, this case has been concluded by our damage assessment engineers that this is a case of self-service or shell opened by non-DJI certified third-party. Therefore the warranty on this craft is considered voided, in accordance to DJI after sales policy.
However, as your current Mavic Air is found self-service and disassembly, we are sorry that the repair fee should be shouldered by customer side. But as our company's goodwill, and you, as our friendly and loyal customer, we can remove this repair fee, and you pay the price difference between Mavic Air and Mavic 2.
In short, we provide an offer for you is paid upgrade to a Mavic 2 pro/zoom.
We would like to know do you accept this offer and we will be more than happy to discuss with you about this in the next email.
If you have any other requests or questions, please contact us.
Thank you.'
Quite honestly I'm disgusted after spending all this money, this is how I'm being treated and accused of doing something I didn't do. This was a lack of care on DJI's side as they either did not service the drone correctly from the previous owner and the previous owner self serviced it, or their engineers were just lazy and didn't follow protocol. I don't believe DJI investigated this properly, as if they did, they could look at the history of the drone and my case so far and see.
So now the only option they are providing me as 'company's goodwill' is to pay for an upgrade to a Mavic Pro 2. I wouldn't touch DJI with a barge poll.
Acquisition is more expensive than retention, something DJI should care more about.
|
|