Labroides
Core User of DJI
Flight distance : 9991457 ft
Australia
Offline
|
HedgeTrimmer Posted at 2-19 19:59
You are assuming Mavic Pro was working to Spec, achieving it's maximum 22-MPH airspeed in P-mode...
Reason I brought up wind-speed vs. Mavic's air-speed:
When you don't know, it's better not to express an opinion.
You are assuming Mavic Pro was working to Spec, achieving it's maximum 22-MPH airspeed in P-mode...
You are assuming I've made an assumption (which I didn't)
I know that he was flying a Mavic pro, capable of well over 22mph because I also know that obstacle avoidance was disabled.
And I can see when his joysticks were centred as well as when they were pushed full forward.
The speed numbers in my prtevious post were from times when his drone was hovering with the sticks centred.
If his drone is blowing away at 10 metres/sec, that's very clear proof of a wind too strong for the Mavic to make headway against.
Why do I have to spell this out to you again after a perfectly clear explanation in my previous post?
Reason I brought up wind-speed vs. Mavic's air-speed:
OP - "There was a little bit windy but I flew sometimes when it was worst."
OP - "I did not realize it was so much windy, I flew many Times in similar condition."
OP - "I fly in similar condition in Peru in Nazca, on the beaches in Colombia, in nepal in Himalaya was exactly the same. Never drone was not able to pit it down, I also think that it was a liitkr bit all and maybe motors were not so strong when it was New one?"
OP - "wheather was good, I did not fsel strong wind in the place where I stand, it was normal"
OP - "I know what I can fly with the wind, in my opinin there was something else not only the wind because the signal lost after 2000m"
And if you understood half of what I've explained a couple of times already in this interminable thread, you would realise that the OP has no idea what he's talking about.
He was on the ground, his drone was 915 feet up battling a headwind that anyone could understand from what his screen would have been showing.
The OP tells a very different story from what the flight data does.
I've got a hunch that the data is more honest.
He doesn't like the truth and would rather believe that there was some mysterious unknown factor that he could blame.
Anyway, none of this is helping OP with his main query: "Is anybody able to find the drone based on my logs? +/- 100m ?"
I already took care of that as well as anyone could, way back in post #5 but Big L doesn't seem to have understood a single word of it.
|
|