m80116
Second Officer
Flight distance : 3264131 ft
Italy
Offline
|
I did a mistake trying to correct a spelling error in my former post, here's a copy of post #6 which I probably overcorrected too many times
---
I wouldn't care less how authorities classify or legally name a drone unless it directly impacts the way I have to tackle the ownership.
Thus, I care for the MM being an ultra-light, I don't care if they classify it as a TOY.
The camera on the MM is surprisingly good for the price, it's flight capabilities are very respectable for what it is... the whole classification thing sheds a light into what these regulations really are: pure BULLCARP. Once the dust will settle on the whole drone-camera world we'll continue enjoying our drones in peace, much like regular cameras are no current object of debate.
Nowadays it is taken for granted what a camera should "take" and what not. Nobody freaks out if you're shoot something on the shelves at a supermarket, nobody expects you to lower your camera when they're just entering your framing. But there was a period about 20 years ago when the digital revolution for the masses begun that FUNDAMENTALISTs (I named you, chime in you two! ha! ) claimed that you couldn't even snap a picture of a public property, for example a bridge or a monument. And they were right... you CAN'T (at least in my country and I think most of EU as well) because the image of the construction or the monument is under legal law a right of the intellectual owner. Of course nobody is now enforcing that rule that's still in place, and people gathers by the flocks to snap pictures of the most famous monuments.
At the same time for a very long time the Flying Integralists Drone Association has been granted the right to fly four engined Boeing 747 replicas for as long as they wanted without much fuss. Projectiles that can reach insane speeds, hand made builds with hand made contraptions with no in-built safety what so ever, and now they're ranting and raginig about general people being allowed to fly drones with such an intrinsic level of safety built in. Meh... let them go, not gonna argue with them, it's a waste of time.
Let's just hope that when the dust would settle they haven't managed to screw it for everybody, because ofc being realistic it can go awfully wrong, we could enter a police state where everything is being legally required to be licensed, registered, copyrighted, enforced... I don't deny it, I am just trying not lay myself open to this kind of nonsense debate.
--- |
|