Labroides Posted at 5-29 01:45
I can't see what's so hard to understand.
He loves his older drone that cost quite a bit more.
He bought a newer cheaper one and complains it's not as good as the more expensive one that he loves.
I have seen the video.
But as I said, all inputs that I have is that the Air 2 is better than the old Mavic Pro.
Any expactations that it would perform better is of course true. It is just sad that in the defence of DJI you would say that the Mavic Pro is better than the Air 2.
But I have not used the Mavic Pro so I can not compare them.
I assume that the Air 2 is better and also assumes that is not an unrealistic expectation, contrary it is a realistic expectation that the Air 2 is better.
This is the points he make in the video:
- Flight time: Return to home in 17 minutes is to short
- Video: 4k/60fps shot in .265 format only.
- Size: The size is to big, comparing to Mavic Pro. Including battery size
- Weight: Handcontroller weighs to much.
- Camera: In sport mode, the camera turns down when flying away.
- Application: The screen goes blank occasionally.
- Range: The ocusync 2.0 is not performing better, the range is about the same, but the signal is lost more often.
- Customer support: Not up to par, needs improvement.
Besides the weight, size and perhaps the flight time, are there anything of this that you would not want or expect to be fixed?
Are there even in any of those points where you would honestly say that anyone buying the Air 2 should expect the Mavic Pro to be better?
|