Quick question for you guys with more experience: if I'm trying to shoot a scenario where manual settings are not ok and I do want auto (e.g. I'm doing a reveal from a dark terrain shot to a brighter sky and I would like the exposure to adjust as the gimbal is raising). Is there any downside to shooting in 60fps and then just use this in a 30fps timeline (without slowing it down, so basically just skipping every other frame). This would ensure the SS never drops below 1/60fps which is what I'm looking for.
I normally shoot with 24 fps, and I set to 60 or 30 only if I want some slowing down at certain spot.
I'm more likely to shoot every single footage with one motion, and I don't shoot a whole long video then cut on post editing.
frankymusik Posted at 6-20 23:28
I think that efforts to improve motion blur will be wiped out if only every second frame is "picked" ...
I always use 25 fps (Europe) and possibly 50 fps if slow motion makes sense.
However, Davinci Resolve, for example, is also able to "improve" (add) Motion Blur afterwards.
Hi. Thank you for reaching out to DJI Forum. I hope that our valued DJI members can provide you the best information for this inquiry. Thank you for your valued support.