alfaholic
lvl.2
Flight distance : 4143734 ft
Serbia
Offline
|
A J Posted at 9-11 01:01
I agree with the points you make though in my experience the MA2 has a much better image quality and superior transmission - I don't get any glitches in the live feed with the MA2. I also find the MA2 far less buggy than the original Pro and an upgrade in practically every area. It also handles heavier wind speeds far more effectively too and is an all round more reliable platform. I have flown my MA2 >2 million feet since buying it in May and have not experienced a single error. The Pro was, however, very feature rich by comparison with more options but if presented with the two drones now I would choose the MA2 everyday of the week. In fact, I even prefer it to the Mavic 2 Pro that I have also owned.
Well, you are right the camera is better, maybe I used to D-LOG so the image does not look too flat now. Also I learned how to extract every bit of data from that sensor now I need to adapt.
I tested some footage before I decided to buy it and yes it is easier to grade as it has more data, there is also more noise in the shadows but less artifacts from noise reduction than Mavic Pro, I believe this D-Cinelike will be enough as D-LOG from Mavic Pro did not have more dynamic range really, just flatter image compared to D-Cinelike and much harder to grade highlights.
As for stability and signal strength, I noticed that it flies more stable and without drifting, Mavic Pro always drifted to one side. Maybe this is because the gimbal is better I am not sure.
I rarely loose the signal completely with Mavic Pro as it happened few times in 3 years, however in 3 flights I had 2 RTH because the drone lost the signal completely.
Still learning how to position this antenas, but there is not much that can be done, maybe to point them out to where the drone is.
Overall I am satisfied, still learning how to extract the best from it. |
|