dundee Posted at 2015-7-13 13:33
Yes Lino, totally agree with you.
I was thinking for stronger signal but within LOS for the 2th re ...
How far way do you plan having the second remote? I can imagine the same would work but both remotes would need these reflectors and they would have to obviously be pointing at each other, which could effect the pilot remote. Does the second remote need to be that far away? How far away does it work as standard?
If one introduces reflections in the path of the beam one gets multipath rejection algorithm kicking in ...it is best to leave the original signal as a beam and use LOS.
LOS reception length in lightbridge is 2-3 km long enough for most journeys :-) the two remotes use 5 ghz channel to talk to each other and will be uneffected
So probably thats the reason because master does not have the same video problems.
I don't know how the master handles the video for the slave remote....Is the device (the tablet or the phone) taking part in this process? Might be an issue with the device processor speed, RAM, etc..?
Is my logic faulty in that while going out of LOS isn't really the goal of extended distance, generally better video quality in short range with some extra forgiveness around obstacles is?
That was a hella long way to send out a bird...nerrrrrrve wracking.
The video being received independently by both the Mater & the Slave Tx comes from the Inspire via 2.4Ghz signal.
The 5.8Ghz signal is what the master & Slave use to communicate with each other and has nothing to do with the video signal.
The slave Tx uses this 5.8Ghz signal link to the Mater Tx to control the camera movements.
So the source of the video signal on the 2th remote is transmitted from the 1st remot ...
Dundee,
5 ghz is the freq used by two remotes to communicate with each other 2.4 ghz is the video signal being beamed to each remote independently...confirmed