aburkefl
Second Officer
Flight distance : 78612 ft
United States
Offline
|
There's an old American saying: "If you ask 10 people for their opinion, you'll get 10 different answers - 11 if one of them is a Harvard man!"
I don't think your question has a single answer. As you can see from the few votes you have already, there are widely differing opinions. When this forum first started, there were lots of questions about how to set your camera for video or for stills and there were lots of opinions. But there was also great advice from a number of professional photographers. One of them - I think it was Jim Hare, and I apologize to whoever it might have been if it wasn't Jim - asked: "What are your goals?" And, the more I thought about it, the more I agreed with that question.
What do you want from your video? What do you *expect* from your video?
The experts say that the 30 fps you get with the 4K will give you enormous detail and the frame rate will produce a more "cinematic" effect. But, what if you're taking the video with the intent to "capture" stills from them? Then, the 1080P with 60 fps will probably deliver better, sharper images. Also, as someone else suggested, if you're going for slow motion, the 60 fps gives you a far better "platform" to create that.
After I read Jim's question and analyzed my own attitude, I decided that I'm basically flying around, having fun, and the camera is running, i.e., I'm taking home movies with an aerial camera. If that's your scenario, whatever looks or feels pleasing at any given time will probably turn out just fine.
Unfortunately, the original question leaves out one parameter - shutter speed. And, when you consider that, the answers take on more complexity. So, in conclusion, my opinion is that there isn't one, single, fits-all situation/format.
|
|