HGDC84
Captain
Finland
Offline
|
I did some ActiveTrack/FaceTrack testing today with my Pocket 2, and after testing it out, I think I kind of see both sides of the argument.
Tested on 1080p and 4K resolutions, varying from 30 to 60fps, using both High Quality and Battery Saver modes. Also alternating between Slow and Fast Follow setting and moving in different directions at different speeds. My results were a mixed bag.
I usually keep my resolutions at 1080p and 30fps, high quality mode enabled. For those and other tests at 1080p, I mostly found the tracking to be at least adequate, most of the time even good for my purposes.
However, at 4K the struggles really started to show up. There clearly were times where the tracking was delayed, jerky or lost me completely altogether. And the most "high-end" modes won't even let you use the tracking.
I guess it really is about your expectations. For me, 1080p is enough (I don't even have a 4K tv), and I think quite many on YouTube still stick to that resolution, and on those specs, I didn't find much to complain about tracking. However, those expecting fluid tracking on 4K are quite probably going to be disappointed.
My tests, of course, weren't perfect. I shot at quite short intervals (probably most likely max at 10 minutes straight or the like), and when trying to separately activate the FaceTrack without drawing the tracking rectangle on the tablet, I couldn't tell if I got it to work. Not even sure though if it should work without drawing the tracking rectangle. Anyone here knowing better?
Also, I was using the DIA handle and had a tablet and the wireless microphone connected. Not sure how leaving some or all of those out would affect the outcome.
I am kind of two-sided on this. For me, I am not too unhappy for the tracking, as I mostly stick to FHD resolutions. However, the advertising won't make the limitations clear, so I am not surprised if somebody expecting to use this mostly at 4K would turn out dissatisfied. |
|