Bashy
Captain
Flight distance : 2354357 ft
United Kingdom
Offline
|
r0bb Posted at 5-31 03:52
So your argument is that it's fine for companies like Tesla, Apple or DJI to make reselling their products hard or impossible by locking out new owners remotely, basically killing the second hand market and forcing everybody to buy their newest products.
Well, I'm not sure what the law (in Europe) currently says about this, but I do know this is a topic of debate just like "right to repair" is in the US.
I can understand both positions, DJI do not know if its stolen.
Then there's buyer who bought it in good faith.
There is a way shops can mitigate this and that's by checking the products prior to refunding.
As they are a shop and obviously an authorised reseller, then proof of purchase should be all that's required from the buyer for DJI to rectify this on their end. After all, the proof is there. Although the nous should really be on the seller to get their original customer to resolve this, but if they have their refund already, they have no incentive to play ball if they do not want to, and there will be some that don't. Its at that point i feel DJI should be able to step in if the authorised seller has done all they can.
For private sales, if a buyer is with the seller then the buyer needs to make sure they can bind it to their account or to go through the binding with the seller. If the seller is not willing to do this for whatever reason, walk away.
If its an online sale then the buyer needs to show proof that its been unbound.
These are just my thoughts, that's all... |
|