CemAygun
Second Officer
Turkey
Offline
|
Bashy Posted at 5-3 18:06
Interesting, to me and compared to normal cameras, mobile, DSLR etc, focus Tracking is something entirely different, it's keeping the subject in focus whilst the camera (pans) tracks it, that's not the same as DJI's Active Tracking, although here FocusTrack is all one word but why after all this time would DJI now rename it? it just confuses the consumer or is it to set apart the big boys from the wee yin? I don't think its the 1st tie i read FocusTrack either and when i saw it before i thought, brill, that could be handy, especially at the track etc... but then i thought, it doesn't make a lot of difference unless the subject is up close, so...
Something else re the "leaflet", the more i look at it, the more it looks "home made". I don't know, it could be legit, the FocusTrack for one, and I'm not sure if I've ever seen DJI report distances like that, before i.e. including interference strong to weak, is that something new? and most of the info is already out there in the void, could the other few extras be guesses based on well, guessing? Thats the sceptic in me, could be well off base on all counts here, thoughts?
I guess if it had variable focus (like the Nano+) they would have been the advertising the auto focus method as well (again, like the Nano+).. So I guess "FocusTrack" is just another marketing profanity, like the "Quad" Bayer Of course I would rather be wrong and it actually is more than a new name for active track.... |
|