RepublicOfAir
lvl.2
Flight distance : 2205121 ft
Spain
Offline
|
The Saint Posted at 6-17 19:52
you realize the purpose of the led lights on the mini 3 pro are for status and in no way supposed to be relied upon for night flight...in any country. therefore, it is not a design flaw since it was never intended for any other purpose. if you cannot use it any other way, that's not great to hear but you cannot demand dji to make it so...what if the leds are all blue? in america, technically the leds are not bright enough to comply....the best move is to find your own solution; they are out there.
if the status leds in any way affect the quality of the video then that would suck and i think dji tried to minimize but it's hardly a design flaw (not trying to nitpick since i know you are using the word loosely).
I have been reviewing the user manual to see if it explicitly says the functionality of the lights but nothing specific appears about its functionality. It is tacitly understood that a function is to indicate the status, in that case, it makes no sense that they turn off when recording since the status of the drone remains the same. If it interferes with the video quality, wouldn't it be a "correct" design to have located the lights in a place where they don't interfere with the quality of the recording and remains indicating the drone status?
On the other hand, DJI seems to have tried to prepare the drone for a class C0 marking in the next regulation, even not selling the highest capacity battery in Europe, however it does not comply with the lighting at night in Europe at least would be absurdly easy to comply with, because it does not specifies the distance at which it should be visible or the intensity, just some blinking green lights, which already exist... but turn off when recording. Is it really not a design or firmware flaw?
I have belonged to a design team and for sure, this would fall within what could be considered a design flaw. If you don't take advantage of the resources you already have to comply with local regulations or any other question, to get the most of customer satisfaction, what is it then?
If it is not a design flaw, I could only understand that DJI has done it intentionally to create an "incomplete" product to make it more attractive to jump to a new model in the future that does have those "little" things that in fact, could already have.
It's just that as much as I think about it, it doesn't make much sense:
In Europe they give us a drone that has green lights to comply with the regulation, weighs less than 250 grams to comply with the regulation, those green lights could also serve to comply with the night flight regulation, but no, they tell you that you already have to use an external device (DJI does not recommend to use any no official device... that makes the drone exceed 250gr and stop complying with the regulations, does it make sense?
In the US I suppose it is easier to exceed the weight without major consequences than to register, but here in Europe you already have to register with a drone of less than 250gr and you cannot directly fly in urban if it exceeds that weight, then we have a magnificent drone with a very bright optics and larger sensor to be able to record much better at night but that does not comply with the regulations for flying at night. I find it a bit ridiculous.
If the lights have only status purposes, why DJI did not keep something like Mini 1/2/SE?. But no, if you observe, the lights are orientated down to see them from earth. ¿really do you need to watch the status at a distance of 800 feet ? no, these leds are also to watch the drone at night.
I hope that in a new firmware update at least, they will give us the option to keep it on or not, then you can put a little piece of tape or 3d printed piece to keep the light out of the camera and it weighs less than 250gr.
|
|