A bit underexposed, but Skypixel doesn't process my corrected version, though Exif is intact ... this one is a JPG straight from my Mini 3.

I hope you like it nevertheless ;-)

That turned out quite well. Nice work.

Thanks, I think the ground is a bit underexposed though ... but the sky is fine. I corrected that in Affinity Photo, but Skypixel processed my corrected Pano forever. A local viewer on my iMac shows the corrected version fine and the complete Exif data is intact. Strange! I was forced to use the original.

Drone Jockey Posted at 8-23 14:46
Thanks, I think the ground is a bit underexposed though ... but the sky is fine. I corrected that in Affinity Photo, but Skypixel processed my corrected Pano forever. A local viewer on my iMac shows the corrected version fine and the complete Exif data is intact. Strange! I was forced to use the original.

Considering that it was sunset, it's perhaps not surprising that some detail was lost in the shadows.
When you upload to Skypixel, the page will never update - it just keeps circling forever. You have to copy the link from the top of the page and, after about ten minutes, paste it into a new tab to see the results of your work.
IK don't know why it does that, but it's annoying.

Yeah ... strange ... but when I did a first test a few days ago, your tip worked. Today it didn't with the edited pano. The original file worked after around 10 minutes after the thumbnail was shown in my profile. Maybe I'll try again tomorrow.

Drone Jockey Posted at 8-23 14:56
Yeah ... strange ... but when I did a first test a few days ago, your tip worked. Today it didn't with the edited pano. The original file worked after around 10 minutes after the thumbnail was shown in my profile. Maybe I'll try again tomorrow.

Good luck with that
Goodnight

Drone Jockey Posted at 8-23 14:46
Thanks, I think the ground is a bit underexposed though ... but the sky is fine. I corrected that in Affinity Photo, but Skypixel processed my corrected Pano forever. A local viewer on my iMac shows the corrected version fine and the complete Exif data is intact. Strange! I was forced to use the original.

Thanks to Blériotʼs tip, I have recently been able to upload a lot of panos converted from TIF to JPG to Skypixel. These images have gone through a series of processing steps in various programs (PanoramaStudio, PS CC 2018 + 2022, Luminar, Topaz), each of which has left its mark on the EXIFʼs. Aside from the endless clutter when uploading, however, Skypixel swallowed them all. I don't think the EXIF data is taken into account at all. If it still does not work today, just strip all EXIFʼs with ExifTool. Maybe it will work then. Good luck!

SPLflyer Posted at 8-23 22:02
Thanks to Blériotʼs tip, I have recently been able to upload a lot of panos converted from TIF to JPG to Skypixel. These images have gone through a series of processing steps in various programs (PanoramaStudio, PS CC 2018 + 2022, Luminar, Topaz), each of which has left its mark on the EXIFʼs. Aside from the endless clutter when uploading, however, Skypixel swallowed them all. I don't think the EXIF data is taken into account at all. If it still does not work today, just strip all EXIFʼs with ExifTool. Maybe it will work then. Good luck!

Interesting ... I also noticed, that Skypixel never uses location data, no matter if Exif or the upload dialog field.

Wonderful sphere shot, Drone Jockey! Well done. Thanks for sharing this with us.

Nice pano.  

A bit underexposed but still a very nice evening 360.  

Very nice sphere!
(a tad under exposed)