fansfe82067d
First Officer
Australia
Offline
|
I can see that keeping it pocketable addresses one requirement, but that might well be at the cost of other requirements. I suspect people will want to see a larger screen, a larger sensor (and thus a larger lens), a larger removable battery (and DJI have said that a removable battery would have increased the physical size of the Pocket 2 somewhat), and so on, and that would mean a device which will need deeper pockets both in the clothing sense and the financial sense. In fact, if the Pocket 3 is everything we would all like it to be, I earnestly hope that they won't call it the Pocket 3. They made that mistake with the Action 2, which really had almost nothing to do with the Action 1 (unlike the Action 3, which did). Hmmm. "The DJI GimbalCam 1" maybe? |
|