Iancraig10
Second Officer
United Kingdom
Offline
|
I ‘think’ the 180 rule is more important if you slow the footage down. No matter what frame rate, the motion blur remains exactly the same as long as the shutter speed was the same.
Also, as you say, it is probably better to use a tripod. Motion blur and camera shake combined looks bad. Many videographers use 24fps at 1/50 sec shutter and holding the camera still might be on the verge of camera shake; especially at longer focal lengths.
30fps at 1/60th or 60 fps at 60th have the exact same amount of blur. So if the best frame rate is 24 fps at 1/50, then the blur looks the same if you use 30fps at 1/50.
Your bike footage looks really good with the filter, so it looks like ‘auto’ on the camera is choosing some good settings. The filter has taken 6 stops away so the shutter must be significantly reduced but what I don’t get, it’s not enough to cause those jitters when you have stabilisation with a low shutter speed.
I’m definitely going to give that a go because your footage looks very natural and less like the more 'normal' spiky looking footage that you can get from Action cams.
I gave it a go today because it was really sunny, but with nd32 or 64 I am getting jitters when I walk! Have to be very careful with the shutter speed if I'm moving...... the washing on the line had great motion blur though when it blew in the wind!
|
|