David Martin Graff
First Officer
Flight distance : 108805200 ft
United States
Offline
|
I had no idea that the user experience would become this completely and incredibly inconvenienced with the the addon and most recent update to the newest firmware, which requires the Avata indefinitely must be hard wired and tethered to a smart device? For Remote ID? Really? How could DJI, who supposedly being the #1 drone manufacturer in the world and expected to work with the FAA and the other countries' regulators to strike a meaningful middle of the road resoluion when it comes to the implementation of Remote ID? Honestly not disclosing this new smart device required connection at the start of announcing the Avata is kind of flawed marketing if you ask me, I mean how many customers would have reservations purchasing a $1,400 drone that it ultimately would be less of a wireless experience in a wireless world?
The new year is a week away, it will be 2023, why does it suddenly look like DJI drones are having less and less gains in technology with their oiriginal non phantom like drones, such as the Spark and Mavic Pro? When I purchased the DJI FPV, I was stressing the battery cable hanging off the side over the DJI Goggles V2. I quickly purchased another of my FatShark Dominator V3 headbands and external battery that worked out well, better than the setup that came with the DJI FPV. Not just using the new 2.5mm batter cable connector to the DJI Goggles 2 and the different brackets that have no way of being accessed by FatShark headbands, which do not have a opening to insert the bands but this new goggles only has access if the bands are velcro so far has prevented me from keeping the goggle setup clean and easy. Realzing now that doing this mod is a moot point because of the requisite to connect a smart device has really stopped me quick in my tracks of enjoying a good FPV experience.
I would think that if this is how it will be indefinitely, I will seek DJI's support in filing for a refund, because that's not fair to introduce a substantial change in the functionality and user experience, and in fair consideration, nothing was specifically stated in any of the written documentation that was included in the box, I checked, did not define a smart device would be required in a future firmware. Therefore, full and fair disclosure precipitated this issue and this prevented me from being an informed consumer who electively made a decision to succumb to this limitation. |
|