dmwierz
lvl.4
Flight distance : 61427 ft
United States
Offline
|
"The Statue of Liberty is the kind of thing we want to take pictures of with these drones! This guy is being bullied just because they feel like it... I would have done the same thing myself if I was in New York."
Oh FFS, seriously? What are we, 12 years old? ..."I'm gonna do something just because I want to do it, without regards to any potential consequences to me or to other people"?
I live smack dab in the middle of a huge metropolitan downtown area, and there are HUNDREDS of parks, places, events, and buildings I would love to photograph or video with my sUAV's, but I (and most other responsible photographers and videographers) have the common sense to realize that I shouldn't do so.
And why is this? There are risks and consequences to our actions.
Firstly there's the safety aspect - people and property are almost always below the potential flightpath, and what would happen should I have an equipment failure? While sophisticated, these things are still toys. They have not been scrutinized or tested to anywhere near the same level as standard aircraft. They can and do break and crash, even in the hands of the best and most experienced operators. While only a couple pounds, a Phantom 3 plummeting into a person from hundreds of feet up with rotors spinning might not end well for anyone.
Secondly, there is a tremendous amount of public scrutiny directed towards drones, and just the sight of one over public and national property is liable to make the news. Flying around locations like the Stature of Liberty (or any other National Park, crowded venues, etc.) and being sighted can only result in bad press for us all.
The only reasons to ignore these risks are:
- Ignorance of the consequences of your actions or of any rules that apply. It appears the OP recognizes this and has learned from the experience - good on you, but the consequences of his actions go far beyond getting a ticket, getting escorted off by LEA's, etc.. His actions reflect poorly on us all, and just the mere fact that he was taken into custody would have provided more fodder for press that is already hungry for any story on drones. The reality of today is, though, that anyone who has the money to buy a Phantom 3 (or any other of the competitors to the P3 series) can take to the skies over anyone, anyplace, at any time, but this is the Genie that is already out of the bottle. This is also the huge challenge to local, municipal, state and national regulators and flying organizations and manufacturers of drones all over the world: come up with ways of enacting regulations and rules that protect against people doing unwise things, without hamstringing safe and responsible operations, both recreational and commercial. Not an easy challenge to meet.
- Lack of care about the potential consequences, and this is even more troubling than number 1. Essentially this means the operator just wants to do whatever he/she wants to do, and believes nobody can say otherwise. Good luck with this, mate.
Come on, folks, THINK about what you're doing before doing it. IDENTIFY what could happen if something went wrong during your flight, and if the risks are too high, don't fly! LEARN about the rules and follow them. DON'T do anything that places other people or property at risk - period, even when or if it might be within current rules. Clearly technology is advancing faster than regulators can craft new rules. Don't make their job easier by doing something stupid and forcing them to come down hard, with bans and heavy regulation fees.
I'm done, now. Officially off my soapbox.
|
|