I’ve been reading about the virtues of the new “stacked sensor” technology - in which the photodiode layer is stacked on top of the circuitry. The effect of this is better dynamic range, better resolution, reduced artifacts, and faster processing. So I assume that, for a given sensor size, the camera with a stacked sensor would have certain advantages over the camera without. The Air 3 has it. I understand that the Mavic 3 series lacks the stacked sensor. Since the Air 3 and Mavic 3 Pro have the same 1/1.3 sensor size in their 3X telephoto cameras, is it reasonable to assume (despite the fixed aperture) that the Air 3 camera may be superior?
|