aburkefl
Second Officer
Flight distance : 78612 ft
United States
Offline
|
I would like to politely take issue with that attitude. perhaps one of those "...we agree that we disagree..." situations.
There seems to be too much perception that the Phantom can be flown behind obstacles. After all, it's using GPS isn't it? (tongue firmly in cheek) Until such time as signals are relayed from the controller to a satellite and then to the Phantom, a highly sophisticated system would be required to identify that (a) an object has come between the controller and the Phantom and (b) what to do about it.
The (b) what to do about part already exists. Each user is responsible for a "failsafe height" on their Phantom. In the event the controlling signal is lost, the Phantom is supposed to ascend/descend to the failsafe height and then RTH. Obviously, the failsafe height needs to be sufficiently high that some other unknown obstacle is not suddenly in the way. Keeping in mind, of course, that if RTH is engaged (either auto or manual), it's going to take the most direct path available back to what it thinks is the Home Point.
How many posts have you seen where the user stated that he/she went behind a building/tree/pile of rocks/hill (fill in the blank) and the Phantom tried to engage RTH and ran into something on the way back?
That, to me, is a classic definition of pilot error. The failsafe altitude was obviously too low.
Move down here to Florida where it's pretty flat pretty much all over the place. The failsafe RTH can be pretty low. Years ago I rode a bicycle for a week in Vermont. One day we went up a steep hill (700 feet change in elevation within two miles) and someone asked us if we practiced hills before coming on the ride. My response was that there isn't anywhere in Florida where there's a 700-foot change in elevation other than in a building!
Art Burke - N4PJ
Leesburg, FL
|
|