That's a nice one What drone did you use?

USER001 Posted at 3-24 11:09
That's a nice one What drone did you use?

Shooting video on mini 3p

Great lapse and a lovely city

Codgerzh2 Posted at 3-24 12:00
Great lapse and a lovely city

There was quite a strong wind and the shutter speed of the photo was 2 seconds, so the drone was not stable during each photo. Because of this, there is some defocus in the video.

Well done. Like the extreme motion blur.

Depp Posted at 3-24 22:34
Well done. Like the extreme motion blur.

This was an experiment, it would be better to use a lower density filter)

An amusing effect on the traffic

Blériot53 Posted at 3-25 00:39
An amusing effect on the traffic

It's hard to get)

Serg SSA Posted at 3-25 01:21
It's hard to get)

I only wish I could drive home that quickly

Lovely blur Serg.  

Blériot53 Posted at 3-25 01:30
I only wish I could drive home that quickly

I would also like to drive like that, especially during rush hour)

DAFlys Posted at 3-25 02:04
Lovely blur Serg.

Thank you! There are a few more videos)

Another great piece! I have an ND1000 for my Osmo Action 3 but I have to sit with it for a LONG time to get a few seconds of decent footage due to the long exposure needed.

osmonauta Posted at 3-25 02:57
Another great piece! I have an ND1000 for my Osmo Action 3 but I have to sit with it for a LONG time to get a few seconds of decent footage due to the long exposure needed.

I used two filters with a total density of ND4000

Serg SSA Posted at 3-25 02:36
I would also like to drive like that, especially during rush hour)

Very impressive lapse.  

This is superb (I already watched it when you shared it earlier, but still).
Can't wait to test this out myself!

Montfrooij Posted at 3-30 12:47
This is superb (I already watched it when you shared it earlier, but still).
Can't wait to test this out myself!

In this video I used a high density ND filter, the shutter speed was too long and many stationary objects were blurred due to the wind, a smaller ND was needed. In this video example, a higher density filter was needed, but I didn’t have one)

Serg SSA Posted at 3-31 00:25
In this video I used a high density ND filter, the shutter speed was too long and many stationary objects were blurred due to the wind, a smaller ND was needed. In this video example, a higher density filter was needed, but I didn’t have one)
https://youtu.be/5kC0-CZ6GQs?si=GYzF2TA_tm6pHk6V

What is the shutterspeed you aim for to get long enough blurs in moving objects but sharp stationairy objects?

Montfrooij Posted at 3-31 04:21
What is the shutterspeed you aim for to get long enough blurs in moving objects but sharp stationairy objects?

Moving objects are blurred better if:
- object speed is higher
- the drone is closer to the object
Stationary objects remain sharp if:
- the drone’s flight speed is lower (the drone takes photographs without stopping in flight)
- shutter speed is shorter (less impact of camera shake and wind)
- the distance from the drone to stationary objects is greater
For the flights I have in the video, I think the optimal shutter speed would be around 1 second if you are filming cars.

Serg SSA Posted at 3-31 11:44
Moving objects are blurred better if:
- object speed is higher
- the drone is closer to the object

Thanks. it will be trial and error.