Kyokushin
Second Officer
Flight distance : 296381 ft
Poland
Offline
|
DJI acion are illegal from an customer or aviation law.
1. There are changes in already bought product.
2. Jamming an controlling devices are prohibited (dji no fly zone is jamming controling functions).
3. Manage of airspace is not in DJI competentions, it is in competency of local authorities.
4. Collecting of personal data like permissions or identifications cards and controlling is not an DJI competency. This is a competentions of police or aviation agency.
I found a three points in my local aviation law what DJI is breaking.
In my country flying over stadiums is not prohibited, and do not require any permissions.
DJI should make a warning zone, not no-fly zone.
If someone will need to make something stupid he will just use breakfest silver foam and do kaboom. He do not need permission from DJI or anybody for that.He also can buy much cheaper Syma products or make a custom uav.
This no-fly restriction over other objects than airports (however i can fly over airport if i get permission from my local airport manager, NOT DJI) make impact only for Dji customers.
DJI is not creating zones, is not manage airspace, and permissions to fly in zones are given by a local authorities and local authorities are manage zones.
UAV operator is responsible for following a rules, local law, and piloting, authorities like FAA or PANSA are responsible for a law, and DJI have nothing to do here.
If you want to create danger zone - please yes, it is good - but in a form of an information, not restrictions.
We are working here and DJI actions make our work impossible or annoying.
|
|