I am looking at purchasing the Inspire 1 as a substitute fora S900. Now before everyone startcrapping on me, please read the complete post. The ultimate setup for me would be the S900 with a GH4 strapped to the bottomwith 2 futaba radios. This setup wouldbe in the $10,000 -$12,000 range and I would be able to go on to creating thebest aerial video footage ever seen (at least in my eyes, ha)! The price of the unit along with theinsurance I would need to carry have kind of put a dampener on my hopes adreams until I can raise the cash.
The Inspire looks too be answer to my dreams. 4K non distorted video view with the abilityto control appiture settings while in flight, start and stop video recording andas well and take photos when ever needed. So many features packed into this well thought out package. I want one just like the rest of you in thisform.
My question to the DJI tech’s and the lucky few that havebeen given a chance to use the Inspire is why does all the video taken look sojagged (the pan looks smooth but the video seems “jumpy”)? I started looking through the interwebs hopingto find a direct comparison Inspire 1 vs S900 with GH4 and to my amazement thereis a company in the UK that has posted footage comparing the 2 two. the low light looks amazing but once again the 4K from the Inspire 1 looks “non fluid”.
Ok ready for all the criticism and bashing I am about toget, would love to know your thoughts. Remember that I am looking at the Inspire 1 as it is advertized “Everythingyou need for aerial filmmaking” this is not a leisure toy to me.
Thanks and Merry Christmas to everyone and all the best in the New Year!
The GH4 will produce better image quality simply out of design; the GH4 has a huge sensor compared to the Inspire's camera. But the inspire camera is not bad in any way - I'd imagine a lot of the "non fluid" video you're seeing is where people are using auto-exposure on the inspire and letting the camera decide what shutter speed to use.
The reason that footage can appear to jump or lag when panning is because the shutter speed of the camera is too high for the frame rate of the video being captured. For example, if you capture at 30fps, you want a shutter speed as close to that frame rate as possible, whilst maintaining good exposure, for example 1/60th of a second, or 1/100th of a second.
This is more of a problem on slower frame rates, 30fps and under.
There's a great video here that explains the concept and how you can set your camera up to avoid stuttering whilst panning.
Hi it is my understanding that aperture settings are fixed at f2.8 that said the production inspire 1s aren't out yet and it was stated the camera housing was to be redone from the prototypes. we just don't know yet what the changes will be but it should be everything you need but their will be higher end options. consider this what if your unit is lost, crashed, stolen, will you want to replace it?
One of the golden rules of videography, or filming in general, is that when panning, an object at one side of the frame should take at least 7 seconds to transition to the other side, or edge, of the frame. That means a fairly slow pan, even for a wide-angle lens like on the Inspire.
In addition, when posting on YT/Vimeo, the compression algorithms that allow for streaming video to users do not handle rapid movement well, as in rapid panning. This creates stuttering of the frames, which is also sometimes called judder, or juddering.
The third source of juddering is the video playing capability of the viewing equipment, as in the video card that is in your computer, which might not be able to handle the playback at normal speed.
As a rule, if planning on a pan, keep shutter speed at twice your frame rate (use ND filter to slow the shutter speed), use lowest frame rate possible (24/25 fps is better than 60 fps), and follow the rule of "7 seconds."
As rbendjebar pointed out, YouTube and Vimeo compression rules out any useful analysis. Scroll to the bottom of this site, and download video files taken directly from the camera:
Wow, thanks for all the input. I do realize that I should never gage final footage viewing from youtude and vimeo, the thing that I found interesting was that in the example I gave both the GH4 and Inspire were show in the same video, giving neither one an advantage or disadvantage.
Even when shooting with my Gopro I will be at 60fps at 1080 and reduce the play back to 75%, this seems to help out with jitters and jerks.
Ultimately I will have to wait for the final specs and options for the Inspire Cam. Wonder if DJi will make a Mini Ronin for the detachable cam for hand held uses (house walk through, filming sporting events from ground level, that kind of thing).
Just use the Inspire and hold it so the camera is level. Not the most ergonomic look, but the camera will stay steady once the Inspire is powered up, right? I'd take off the props, though.
Do you know if it is possible to take a picture while filming ? if possible there will be less interest for us to increase the shutter speed at least in sunny conditions.
Digital Cinema, that is the link I used as an example. The Inspire footage seemed a bit "choppy", I know that you can not really compare the inspire cam to the GH4. Do you happen to have any other footage with the inspire i can take a peek at?
I wanted to say thank you again to Digital Cinema, I do really appreciate you taking the time to answer the questions I have asked. I have one last one for you, with you guys working with the high end cameras and platforms for aerial video, do you feel that the inspire 1 is a good starting point into semi pro aerial work? Or do I just rape pillage and steal what ever money I can get my hands on and save to afford a S900 with a GH4 and all the bells and whistles. I have been in model flying for 15 years and have had my phantom 2 for just about a year now.
Thanks again, nice to talk to someone in the industry at your level.
I had a look at your web site. If your market is (for now) as it appears on your site then have a good look at an Inspire. If your plans at some stage include print or broadcast images or video then look at a bigger rig.
Even the preproduction unit we have with a beta version of the iOS app is a handy platform for some jobs. We're using it commercially.
Hope it helps.
are you sure that 24p is better then 60frames? It will be not fluid, like a cinema movie. 60frames is really smooth like water and youtube can play 60frames now as far as i know.
My Vision 2 plus:
When panning across a surface with a regular pattern such as a corrugated metal roof, my videos display a flicker or strobing appearance in those frames. Is that juddering? What can I try to avoid this? I'm running a 32 Gig micro SD card with "up to" 80 MB/s write speed.
The 'pattern' you're seeing is a known as a Moiré pattern in photography terms. It's due to how the camera sensor processed light in the Bayer filter. Some cameras are more prone to it than others, I guess the design of the Vision+'s FC200 camera makes it prone.
Some people have suggested turning the Sharpening option to the minimum as this will lessen the effect.
I don't have an Inspire so I don't know. I'm sure once the production Inspires are in hand there will be lots of reviews by very knowledgable people.
My guess is that the performance will be similar to the GoPro 4 Black since that and the Inspire 1 use the same Sony sensor (along with the same Bayer filter).