mike.wildlight
lvl.4
Flight distance : 5623 ft
Australia
Offline
|
Hi Ken,
I know you are trying to do your best in what is a controversial subject (I wish I could tag Brendan here ). I'll explain why I think there is so much furore.
DJI have brought this upon themselves (not you-DJI)
* DJI announced that geofencing is coming, not as a trial but coming, in fact the title in the November 17, 2015 press release (Press Release) is "DJI Introduces New Geofencing System for its Drones". It further states "The new mapping system will become available in December via an update of the DJI Go app and drone firmware"
*Then in December, the time at which the press release indicated it would be implemented, DJI announces the beta test. This is the "we think this is what it'll look like"
*The beta test mapping was wayyyyy wrong and had to be quickly revised, and there were all sorts of problems with that. DJI employees (such as yourself) have been very helpful in helping people with these issues.
*DJI have since been very slim on communication with keeping people updated about progress, refinements, implementation goals and dates.
Of course people are frustrated/nervous/upset, for many there is a fear that DJI is seeking to become an enforcer beyond any legal requirement anywhere.
I urge you to keep helping as you are but understand "what the fuss is about".
For my part I wish DJI would stick to a part of that original announcement "The GEO system is advisory only." I've taken this out of context slightly, but in honesty that is the approach a supplier manufacturer should take.
If it cannot be implemented perfectly, accurately and reliably it should not prevent flying anywhere! by all means though advise a user that they may be entering restricted areas. THAT would be a brilliant feature that would attract purchasers rather than repel them.
end of sermon |
|