Bearing in mind if you upload a video you are promoting DJI's products for them, their T&C's seem to be a hefty price to pay. Could they take anymore?
" By posting or otherwise making available any User Content on or through Skypixel, you expressly grant, and you represent and warrant that you have all rights necessary to grant, to Skypixel a royalty-free, sublicensable, perpetual, transferable, irrevocable, non-exclusive, worldwide license to use, reproduce, modify, publish display, and make derivative works of all such User Content and your name, voice, and/or likeness as contained in your User Content, in whole or in part, and in any form, media or technology, whether now known or hereafter developed, for use in connection with Skypixel (and our successors’ and affiliates) business, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing our web service in any media formats and through any media channels."

And you expect anything different?
Skypixel is purely a channel for DJI to source free raw content for marketing purposes, nothing more.
It is intended to hook into people's inherent need to show off.

Avoid it if you don't want to give away your content.

That is expected.

teamnest1 Posted at 2016-1-2 05:06
That is expected.

That's the problem these days, everyone just sits back and 'ACCEPTS' it and does nothing about it. Have you looked at the Terms & Condition you have to accept to use apps - take a look.

You're right, everyone wants to be famous.

Chandos Posted at 2016-1-2 04:24
That's the problem these days, everyone just sits back and 'ACCEPTS' it and does nothing about it. ...

Its the way it works in todays world. Nothing is free. You pay with either money, your information, time, etc.

Just take the positive and have fun with the SkyPixel program.

teamnest1 Posted at 2016-1-2 19:05
Its the way it works in todays world. Nothing is free. You pay with either money, your information ...

Nothing 'fun' about paying to by the equipment then being expected to give away what you have created - where's 'reasonable' come into it?

Doesn't this make it illegal for most flyers in the US who aren't supposed to use images for commercial purposes?  While I doubt it's policed, it seems like taking photos and giving them to DJI for marketing purposes without a 333 is problematic.