gnixon2015
lvl.4
United States
Offline
|
someone shared the magnetic field of the earth in another thread, you can clearly see that some areas of some countries, you could need to recalibrate even 50 miles away, some areas you wouldnt have to for several hundred miles or even more. there are nearly no locations on that map (where people actually live) that appear to require recalibration if the 'new' location is just a few miles from where you calibrated.
ive flown at 4 locations, all within 15mi of the first place i calibrated. the simple fact that people have calibrated a bunch and 'never had a problem' has nothing to do with the statistical odds of two scenarios:
1. you dont calibrate (and you needed to) and you experience a flyaway
2. you do calibrate and you do it wrong and you experience a flyaway
one of those could still be (just using this as an example) 100x more likely than the other and just because of that doesnt mean you couldnt make the wrong choice 100 times and not experience the flyaway. no different than riding in a car without your seatbelt 100 times in a row without dying DOESNT MAKE IT A BETTER METHOD.
the real question becomes (if you take out 'distance and earth EMF' which was shared on that map in the other thread), WHAT THINGS can cause the compass to become 'uncalibrated' or 'less accurate' between flights. if the hardware itself (if flown from the exact same location) persists a good calibration state, then why in the world would you recalibrate every time (like people if have seen say they recalibrate in between battery swapouts in the same location). im not understanding the factual rationale for that except for someone 'thinking that recalibrating is good' without any factual data. |
|