fansb1fe1104
Second Officer
Flight distance : 3372566 ft
United States
Offline
|
RSW Posted at 2016-12-19 22:19
Yes it is true. You ignored the whole point about a "given unit of measure" like in a display or a printed images, regardless of the total number of pixels. One inch on the phone screen contains more pixels than on inch on the TV. Wikipedia explains this in some detail with all the caveats but concludes, "The term resolution is often used for a pixel count in digital imaging, even though British, American, Japanese, and international standards specify that it should not be so used, at least in the digital camera field." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_resolution)
On the other hand, the term "total resolution" is often used as the video equivalent of megapixels for a still image. "Total resolution" a bit different than the simple definition of "resolution". It is the width in pixels times the height in pixels and does not take into account any pixels per unit of measure. It's really the total number of pixels is all. When you talk about "total resolution", 4k is indeed 4 times the resolution of 1080. Here are some examples of what I'm talking about.
Resolution has never been defined by total number of pixels. Resolution is always measured in either Pixels per inch or dots per inch....so on a diagonal 40 inch screen 1920x1080 has a resolution of 55 pixels per inch. while 4096x2160 on a 40 inch screen=115 pixels per inch. So while yes it is true that it contains 4 times the amount of total pixels, the pixels per inch is just a little over 2 times....which means that for every inch of HD 1920x1080 you can fit twice as many pixels in the same inch...Which obviously means its able to store twice the amount of information into each inch. Hence the detail in UHD is only twice as much than HD. |
|