mizzle09 Posted at 2016-5-3 03:48
Very nice! I'm curious of what causes those random seconds of garbled image every few seconds though ...
My guess for the garbled images is that the YouTube encoder is overwhelmed by the fine detail of the video and the speed at which the image changes. When I encoded the original I used a 36mbps data rate and two passes and it plays crystal clear all the way through. This is about a 50% data rate reduction from the original recorded with the phantom.
It played in 1440 for me. I was going to critique some parts like PAN speeds, but then I realized I was looking at it at 1440. The artifacts mentioned earlier were also in 1440.
As I said before, Good Job! Sometimes display gets in the way of viewing good work.
Nice clip. I think you are right about the amount of fine detail swamping the encoder. BTW, is that a paid subscriptiobn to Vimeo? Last time is used it you could not get high definition clips unless you paid.
Nice video, and yes much better than you tube... question, I uploaded 2 versions of a video, you tube and vimeo thinking that the vimeo version would look much clear, better, but I think they look about the same. any tips or suggestions on what to do next time?, thank you.
mrnvldz Posted at 2016-5-4 00:41
Nice video, and yes much better than you tube... question, I uploaded 2 versions of a video, you tub ...
To get a good rendered video nothing beats a high data rate. The YT clip uploaded had 56mbps single pass. Surprisingly YT's re-render did not do a good job.