E7cfBvztOaKm
New
Offline
|
While Brendan Schulman's goal and as a result DGI's is a noble one. I personally believe its currently being implemented inapropriately.
First, does this send a message to your competitors that don't have this restrictive system to push a "we don't tell you where you should fly" marketing campeign, and on that note, why would DGI not just inform users of restricted areas instead of programming the aircraft to land immediately when in a restricted zone. What is Mr Brendan Schulman's opinion on DGI's liability if this happens and involves an incident when the aircraft lands? An aircraft forced to land outside the control of the person controlling it, irrespective of where the aircraft is, puts the control in DGI's hands and I think would put the liability in DGI's hands for not landing perfectly safely... i.e. Hitting a power line and causing damage, falling into a construction zone, falling on top of a baby carriage, we can all think of many different types of incidents where this might happen.
Secondly, instead of just notifying users of warning areas, DGI chose to in effect act as a government agency by enforcing rules they decided is specifically tailored to resolve a problem they have no control over creating the rules for...
In effect DGI is setting a bad example for other companies, not necessarily in the drone field by enforcing these rules on their own, instead of just conforming to current laws and informing their customers they THEY have to conform to them.
I think money is better spent on reaserch and development in inovations in future products than the hundreds of man hours it to to get the GeoFencing accomplished. I'm almost sure no other drone company will see any benefit from this complex issue other than to wait and see what the government implements in the law, and finds acceptable, but that does not mean you should implement constrictions (like restricting the use of your product, and adding abberent controls to land aircraft) you deem applicable to the law... You are not lawmakers, the FAA is.
This is not to say that you should not meet with, consult, and advise the FAA, and your customers, on the contrary. Form there you will know where to go. But inadvertently adding rules and controls on your devices as a non agency is a recipe for failure...
I suggest you make these controls advisaries only and not controls. No one likes to be controlled, unless there is a law in place, and then most law abiding citizens will follow them. Roges will always be out there, and you won't be able to stop them with your GEO Fencing, you will just be encourageing them, and devaluating your product line overall.
These are just my opinions I hope they provide food for thought, and I wish the best for your product, and I wish for the best for the FAA as they create resulations that don't stifle inovation but creates advancements in technology, much like DJI has done in the drone field, right up until now...
Regards,
Alex |
|