martin94b
lvl.3
Offline
|
We had that discussion allready.
Sure I could take DSLR and do timelapse with additional (expensive) slider / rotating stuff, which unfortunatly is also quite hard to program.
But:
1) using a DSLR for TimeLapse is way too expensive. Why? Simply because the shutter of a common DSLR is built for about 100.000 shots only. This equals only little more than one hour (!) of final TimeLapse movie in 24fps. Not including waste recordings ;-)
2) A DSLR is primarily built to take pictures. So if you are talking about the right equipment for the right job, a photo camera might not be the right tool either.
3) Most important: DJI advertises the OSMO as a TimeLapse camera! And they fooled me and many others by additionally promising rotating gimbal movement. Now (after I spent all that money) they tell us well, the Osmo is not really made for TimeLapsing... WHAT?! Still no 4k TimeLapse as advertised, limited single shots to only 0.5 Hz (= 1 frame every 2 seconds), still no rotating gimbal movement, no DJI tooling for creating TimeLapse from regular 4k video (24fps) in Post production etc etc.
4) From a system architecture point of view the Osmo is very well capable of becoming a very nice and handy TimeLapse camera. Its already capable of recording 4k @24 and even 30 fps, so why wouldn´t it be capable of recording 4k video with less fps (e.g. 1 fps)? Osmo+ now offers the desired gimbal rotation for TimeLapse, and Litchi, the 3rd party app, shows that Osmo X3 is capable of what DJI did promise last november - DJI just refuses to develop / publish the required Software / Firmware for it... and that pisses me off, because I already paid for it! |
|