james.mcmillan
lvl.2
Flight distance : 71739 ft
United States
Offline
|
So, two thoughts:
Note, it's not just the processing power required on the phone for pattern recognition, but it also requires the video to be downloaded from the Osmo to the phone first before it can perform the pattern recognition processing - and this takes time. The result is that pattern tracking may be somewhat sluggish.
Regarding delivering functionality to the Osmo, DJI is clearly responsible for delivering all the functionality that was promised when the product was introduced. There can be no excuse for not doing so. However, delivering new functionality for existing products that is incorporated into newer products, maybe yes, maybe no. Adding new functionality to DJI GO (tracking in this case) is not free. DJI has to commit resources to do it. Obviously, technically, pattern tracking can be done because two third-party apps, AutoFrame and Vertical Studio, have done it. However, apparently, DJI has chosen to deploy those resources elsewhere. For DJI to remain healthy, they must be continuously developing new products. Adding new functionality to existing products must compete for those limited resources. Most times, new product development will win that trade-off because it offers the opportunity to increase their revenue. Adding functionality to existing products - without charging for it - just can't compete. Fortunately, DJI created an open platform that allows third-party developers to add functionality as they see the opportunity. Effectively, DJI has outsourced some of their new feature development activity to third-parties for their older products. That doesn't sound so unreasonable to me. |
|