RaySchlogel
lvl.1
United States
Offline
|
I'm so confused by the amount of baulking over the concept. Seems to me utterly brilliant. How many of the drone laws that we are subjected to are over the fear of drones dropping out of the sky? Maybe it wouldn't save the Mavic if ya ran it into a building but could be a nice favor to the people below it. One could say that according to the FAA drone pilots aren't supposed to do that in the first place, have ya seen any of Casey Neistat's videos? Love his stuff but it's hard not to see the potential danger. And there are a slew of others up there that are similar. Watched one today with a particularly annoying guy flying his over Beverly Hills Boulevard, a hotel person told him that he called the police, and the guy said smugly "It was under 400 ft so call the police, I know the law." Then he went home and looked up the law and beyond comprehension was latter asking a friend about range extenders that would let him fly it 7 miles. Drones are imperfect, they malfunction all the time, even amazing ops can have something go awry, and yea, a crash into a tree branch may break a blade or two but it's the plummeting to earth that'll kill it. I'm a new op, I barely know what the heck I'm doing, but think I'd feel a whole lot better having that fail-safe and hope DJI or someone invents something to fill that need. I'm not the first to say it but there are a whole lot of people who aren't following the guidelines, the laws, or common sense, and the first time someone drops one out of the sky and kills someone pro's and hobbyist are gonna get the hurt on. The public by and large ain't fans of em as is. My 2 cents =) |
|